Winners and losers of school choice: Evidence from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Santiago, Chile
Fatima Alves,
Gregory Elacqua (),
Mariane Koslinki,
Matias Martinez,
Humberto Santos and
Daniela Urbina
International Journal of Educational Development, 2015, vol. 41, issue C, 25-34
Abstract:
School choice is a controversial topic in the education debate. Proponents argue that choice would open up opportunities to disadvantaged families. Critics counter that choice may exacerbate inequities as advantaged parents are more likely to choose the best schools. Rio de Janeiro and Santiago provide unique institutional contexts in which to explore how choice may affect equity. We use datasets with information on home addresses to compare the choices of parents with different backgrounds. We find that disadvantaged parents in both cities are less likely to choose high achieving schools. The differences are more pronounced in Santiago than in Rio. These results suggest that choice policies will likely not reduce inequities and the design of the program influences behavior.
Keywords: Educational policy; Comparative education; School choice; Educational equity; Vouchers; Geospatial analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059314001515
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:injoed:v:41:y:2015:i:c:p:25-34
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.12.004
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Educational Development is currently edited by Stephen P Heyneman
More articles in International Journal of Educational Development from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().