Expected utility and catastrophic consumption risk
Masako Ikefuji,
Roger Laeven,
Jan Magnus (jan@janmagnus.nl) and
Chris Muris
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2015, vol. 64, issue C, 306-312
Abstract:
An expected utility based cost-benefit analysis is, in general, fragile to distributional assumptions. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions on the utility function of consumption in the expected utility model to avoid this. The conditions ensure that expected (marginal) utility of consumption and the expected intertemporal marginal rate of substitution that trades off consumption and self-insurance remain finite, also under heavy-tailed distributional assumptions. Our results are relevant to various fields encountering catastrophic consumption risk in cost-benefit analysis.
Keywords: Expected utility; Catastrophe; Consumption; Cost-benefit analysis; Risk management and self-insurance; Power utility; Exponential utility; Heavy tails (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 D81 G10 G20 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668715001006
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:insuma:v:64:y:2015:i:c:p:306-312
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2015.06.007
Access Statistics for this article
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is currently edited by R. Kaas, Hansjoerg Albrecher, M. J. Goovaerts and E. S. W. Shiu
More articles in Insurance: Mathematics and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu (repec@elsevier.com).