Reducing the effect size of the retest effect: Examining different approaches

Martin E. Arendasy and Markus Sommer

Intelligence, 2017, vol. 62, issue C, 89-98

Abstract: Allowing test-takers to retake cognitive ability tests has been shown to increase test-takers' test scores. Three models differing regarding to the processes assumed to be responsible for this effect have been advanced in the literature. These models make competing predictions (1) regarding the level of measurement invariance across test administration sessions, and (2) regarding the extent to which effect sizes of the retest effect can be minimized by means of alternate retest forms and different item administration formats (fixed-item linear tests vs. computerized adaptive tests) on the effect size of retest effects. The present study systematically varied the item administration format and the retest form across five experimental conditions. Test-takers (N=960) were randomly assigned to these conditions and solved four cognitive ability tests at two time-points of measurement (test-retest interval ≈ 1month). Measurement invariance analyses and analyses of the effect sizes of the retest effects across experimental conditions were in line with a model attributing retest score gains to learning during test-taking. The results also indicated that the effect size of the retest effect can be substantially reduced by administering computerized adaptive test forms at the initial test administration session in order to prevent learning during test-taking.

Keywords: Retest effect; Identical vs. alternate test forms; Computerized adaptive testing; Automatic item generation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616302963
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intell:v:62:y:2017:i:c:p:89-98

DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2017.03.003

Access Statistics for this article

Intelligence is currently edited by R.J. Haier

More articles in Intelligence from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().