Working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, and the continued influence effect: A latent-variable analysis
Christopher R. Brydges,
Gilles E. Gignac and
Ullrich K.H. Ecker
Intelligence, 2018, vol. 69, issue C, 117-122
Abstract:
Misinformation often affects inferences and judgments even after it has been retracted and discredited. This is known as the continued influence effect. Memory processes have been theorized to contribute to the continued influence effect, and much previous research has focussed on the role of long-term memory processes at the time misinformation is retrieved during inferential reasoning and judgments. Recently, however, experimental research has focussed upon the role of working memory (WM) processes engaged in the updating and integration of information, when the retraction is encoded. From an individual differences perspective, susceptibility to continued influence effects should be predicted by a person's WM abilities, if continued reliance on misinformation is influenced, at least in part, by insufficient integration of the initial misinformation and its subsequent retraction. Consequently, we hypothesized that WM capacity would predict susceptibility to continued influence effects uniquely and more substantially than short-term memory (STM) capacity. Participants (N = 216) completed a continued-influence task, as well as a battery of WM and STM capacity tasks. Based on a latent variable model, our hypothesis was supported (WM capacity: β = −0.36, p = .013; STM capacity: β = 0.22, p = .187). Consequently, we suggest that low WM capacity is a measurable “risk factor” for continued reliance on misinformation.
Keywords: Individual differences; Working memory; Short-term memory; Continued influence effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289617303641
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intell:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:117-122
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2018.03.009
Access Statistics for this article
Intelligence is currently edited by R.J. Haier
More articles in Intelligence from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().