Alternative ways of studying time in qualitative international business research: A review and future agenda
Ziad Elsahn and
Anna Earl
Journal of International Management, 2022, vol. 28, issue 3
Abstract:
Our study provides a systematic theoretical review of 304 qualitative-based articles published in seven international business journals from 2010 to 2020. We constructed a typology that provides alternative ways of studying time and is constituted by two dimensions: ontological conceptions of time (objective vs subjective) and theorising style of research (variance vs process). Our analysis and findings illustrate that time is mostly treated as objective and linear, and they highlight some concerning trends: lack of conceptual clarity; lack of diversity within and between paradigms; and lack of methodological clarity. We propose three pathways for advancing future research on time.
Keywords: Time; Temporality; Theorising; Systematic theoretical review; Subjective time; Objective time (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425322000321
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:intman:v:28:y:2022:i:3:s1075425322000321
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/601266/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 601266/bibliographic
DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2022.100957
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of International Management is currently edited by M. Kotabe
More articles in Journal of International Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().