Words, words, words: The remarkable perseverance of Magna Carta

Stephen F. Williams

International Review of Law and Economics, 2016, vol. 47, issue S, 67-71

Abstract: Magna Carta poses the question of how a document (mere “parchment,” in the classic dismissive phrase) actually has an impact, 800 years after its adoption, on protection of rights and limitation of government. This argument competes with a quite different narrative, in which particular configurations of social forces are essential to any serious progress in either of these realms. (See, e.g., Olson, 1993). My tentative hypothesis is that although the modern force of the document is purely rhetorical it is nonetheless real, and derives in significant part from: (1) its arising at least in part from the sort of pressure contemplated by Olson; (2) its having considerable concrete applicability in the short run (so that it can get “practice” that is recognized as such); (3) its having in some clauses a degree of generality and aspiration (rhetorical appeal), so that citizens can deploy it for realization of broader, not immediately realizable goals; and (4) its being attached to some kind of institutional framework for its realization. These characteristics made possible the gradual (though to be sure uneven) accretion of a reputation, which, coupled with the drama of its origin, account for its modern substance as persuasive rhetoric.

Keywords: Constitutional law; Economic history; Magna Carta; Constitutional history; Rhetoric (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144818816300254
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:47:y:2016:i:s:p:67-71

DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2016.05.009

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Law and Economics is currently edited by C. Ott, A. W. Katz and H-B. Schäfer

More articles in International Review of Law and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().