Drivers of solvency risk – Are microfinance institutions different?

Markus Schulte and Adalbert Winkler

Journal of Banking & Finance, 2019, vol. 106, issue C, 403-426

Abstract: Based on a dataset covering 2938 banks and 1078 microfinance institutions (MFIs) operating in 106 countries this paper compares drivers of MFI and bank solvency risk. Measuring solvency risk by the non-performing loans (NPL) ratio we find that several factors driving the bank NPL ratio play a more subdued role for MFIs. By contrast, MFI Z-scores, notably those of MFI banks, credit unions and other MFIs, are driven by largely the same factors as bank Z-scores. The difference in results can be linked to the special characteristics of credit technologies pursued by MFIs. Given that the Z-score is the broader risk measure we conclude from our results that larger and deposit taking MFIs should be subject to the same regulatory and supervisory regimes as banks.

Keywords: Microfinance; Bank risk; Financial stability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G01 G21 G31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426619301566
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbfina:v:106:y:2019:i:c:p:403-426

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.07.009

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Banking & Finance is currently edited by Ike Mathur

More articles in Journal of Banking & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().