Is firm growth random? A machine learning perspective

Arjen van Witteloostuijn and Daan Kolkman

Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 2019, vol. 11, issue C, -

Abstract: This study contributes to the firm growth debate by applying machine learning. We compare a prominent machine learning technique – random forest analysis (RFA) – to traditional regression in terms of their goodness-of-fit on a dataset of 168,055 firms from Belgium and the Netherlands. For each of these firms, we have one to six years of historical data involving demographic and financial information. The data show high variation in firm growth rates, which is difficult to capture with traditional linear regression (R2 in the range of 0.05–0.06). The RFA fares three to four times better, achieving a much higher goodness-of-fit (R2 of 0.16–0.23). RFA indicates that perhaps firm growth is less random than suggested by traditional regression analysis. Generally, given the modest selection of variables in our dataset, this demonstrates that machine learning can be of value to firm growth research.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673418301264
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:11:y:2019:i:c:3

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00107

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Venturing Insights is currently edited by Dimo Dimov

More articles in Journal of Business Venturing Insights from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().