EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

An opportunity to say no: Comparing local community attitudes toward onshore unconventional gas development in pre-approval and operational phases

Dr Rod McCrea, Dr Andrea Walton and Ms Talia Jeanneret

Resources Policy, 2020, vol. 69, issue C

Abstract: Unconventional gas (UG) continues to play an important role in Australia's energy supply, though it depends on having a social licence in local regions where it is planned or operating. Little research has examined how a social licence for UG development varies between pre-approval and operating phases of the industry. Using survey data for 800 residents, this research examines overall attitudes and underlying perceptions of coal seam gas (CSG) in two agricultural regions in Australia in different phases of UG development – Narrabri, New South Wales (NSW) in the pre-approval phase and the Western Downs, Queensland (Qld) in the operational phase. While the proposed development was considerably smaller in Narrabri than in the Western Downs, Narrabri residents were more likely to reject the proposed CSG development. However, this was not due to these residents having less favourable underlying perceptions of CSG development. In fact, they viewed some aspects of CSG development more favourably than their Qld counterparts. The difference was attributed to a unique phase effect which we argue reflects an enhanced “opportunity to say no” in the pre-approval phase of development. Nonetheless, underlying perceptions still predicted individual variation in attitudes and feelings toward CSG very well, suggesting that while enhanced opposition can be expected in the pre-approval phase, overall attitudes and feelings can also become more positive by improving the underlying drivers important for determining local residents' perceptions of the industry such as industry impacts and benefits, governance, distributional fairness, and trust in the industry.

Keywords: Social acceptance; Protest; Onshore gas; Fracking; Coal-bed methane (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420720308564
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:69:y:2020:i:c:s0301420720308564

DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101824

Access Statistics for this article

Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert

More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:69:y:2020:i:c:s0301420720308564