EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Exploring the dilemma of overcapacity governance in China's coal industry: A tripartite evolutionary game model

Yadong Wang, Delu Wang and Xunpeng Shi

Resources Policy, 2021, vol. 71, issue C

Abstract: Coal overcapacity reduction is an essential part of China's energy transition. An effective governance model is a key to realizing the smooth exit of excess coal capacity. We construct a tripartite evolutionary game model involving the central government (CG), local governments (LGs) and coal enterprises (CEs), and then use it to examine the dilemma of overcapacity governance and alternative policies. Our results demonstrate that: First, the evolutionary convergence of strategy among the tripartite game agents exhibits a reliable degree of interdependence. The market-oriented central regulation mechanism of the CG may incentivize LGs to take a strict implementation. Also, when the LGs strictly perform the de-capacity policy, CEs are more active in responding to the de-capacity task. Second, the stable and ideal evolutionary state of (0,1,1) can be achieved when the corresponding conditions are met, which indicates that the coal de-capacity should coordinate the interests of multiple stakeholders. Third, inspired by the parameters sensitivity simulation, reducing the de-capacity costs, a balanced performance appraisal system, an appropriate supervision and punishment mechanism for de-capacity implementation, and increasing the investment in technological innovation and upgrading can promote the effective management of the coal overcapacity issue. This study can more genuinely reflect the complicated dynamic game process of China's coal de-capacity than the previous studies, and thus provides insights and decision-making references for the design of an effective coal overcapacity governance mode.

Keywords: Coal overcapacity; Governance; Tripartite evolutionary game; Evolutionary stable strategy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420721000179
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:71:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721000179

DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102000

Access Statistics for this article

Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert

More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-23
Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:71:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721000179