Evaluation of mining projects subjected to economic uncertainties using the Monte Carlo simulation and the binomial tree method: Case study in a phosphate mine in Egypt
Ahmed Kamel,
Mohamed Elwageeh,
Stefano Bonduà and
Mohamed Elkarmoty
Resources Policy, 2023, vol. 80, issue C
Abstract:
Mining project evaluation is a very complex process and time-consuming task. Any mining project passes through several study stages, like conceptual, preliminary feasibility, and feasibility studies, using a systematic and standardized approach. These studies allow investors to evaluate the exploitations alternatives according to economic and technical criteria to make a better decision. This research aims to study a model for investment risk analysis developed for the case study of “Abu Tartur mining project, Egypt.” Abu Tartur plateau is rich in phosphate rock, turned into phosphoric acid and fertilizers. This study used site-specific data that has been taken from the literature to build evaluation models using the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and the Binomial Decision Tree (BDT) methods. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) is considered a benchmark method for all other evaluation methods. The MCS method uses a set of parameters that, in some cases, will give a higher NPV of the project and some others with lower values, but this depends on the probability of the input parameters. The developed evaluation models allowed a specific range of values, with confidence intervals as the MCS model. The advantage of using a probabilistic approach helps in the decisional phase, allowing for a more precise overview of the variability of the final economic value of the mine. Deterministic methods, like the DCF method, offer a solution that is limited to uncertainty analysis.
Keywords: Risk analysis; Monte Carlo simulation; DCF; Phosphate economics; Binomial tree (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420722007097
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:80:y:2023:i:c:s0301420722007097
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103266
Access Statistics for this article
Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert
More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().