Regional governance by the South Asia Cooperative Environment Program (SACEP)? Institutional design and customizable regime policy offering flexible political options

Pradip Kumar Sarker, Md Saifur Rahman and Lukas Giessen

Land Use Policy, 2018, vol. 77, issue C, 454-470

Abstract: International governance by global, and especially by regional environmental regimes, is increasingly gaining attention in both political practice and academia. Such regimes may be clearly geared towards a specific environmental issue, which is at the core of the institutional design. Over time, regimes may also develop environmental regime policies. Using the case of the regional South Asia Cooperative Environment Program (SACEP), and based on 1982–2017 qualitative data from key regime policy documents and interviews, we pose the empirical question of whether the SACEP regime has been capable of developing a strong environmental regime policy in the period since 1982. We do so by pursuing the following research questions: What is the institutional design of SACEP making up the regime structures? Which policy issues, goals, instruments and implementing actors can be identified within the regional environmental SACEP regime? Our findings suggest that the institutional design is the result of a UNEP spin-off for more effective cooperation on environmental issues in South Asia. While serving the bureaucratic interests of UNEP, this design was in line with the interests of India as a regional power, through which it advanced its hegemony within South Asian environmental cooperation. The environmental policy developed within the SACEP regime is characterized by the very large number of issues covered, a lack of concrete and substantial policy goals, short-term and limited donor projects as the only instruments, and the vague mention of Member States as implementing actors. We conclude that the absence of a meaningful, streamlined and/or politically highly visible regime policy renders the SACEP regime policy an ad-hoc assortment of policies, which is, for strong donor countries, a “menu to choose from”.

Keywords: International governance; Regional environmental governance; Regional regimes; UNEP spin-off; Regime policy; Ad-hoc policy; Environmental policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717316502
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:454-470

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.009

Access Statistics for this article

Land Use Policy is currently edited by Jaap Zevenbergen

More articles in Land Use Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joice Jiang ().