EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

When (and how) to favor incumbents in optimal dynamic procurement auctions

Vinicius Carrasco, Paulo Orenstein and Pablo Salgado

Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2016, vol. 62, issue C, 52-61

Abstract: We consider the problem faced by a benevolent government agency that procures in each of T>1 periods an indivisible good from one of N>1 firms. The procurement process is complicated by the superior information possessed by firms about their time-varying production costs and efficiency-enhancing efforts. We fully characterize the optimal dynamic procurement. To reduce firms’ informational rents, the government introduces distortions along two dimensions: when selecting from which firm to procure the good and when providing incentives toward efforts in cost reduction. Both distortions interact in a non-trivial way. Firms that draw lower cost parameters in the first period are favored in the selection process in all later periods, which allows for the provision of more powerful incentives.

Keywords: Dynamic procurement; Auctions; Time-varying private information; Selection procedure; Dynamic mechanism design (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406815001263
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:mateco:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:52-61

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2015.10.008

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Mathematical Economics is currently edited by Atsushi (A.) Kajii

More articles in Journal of Mathematical Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:mateco:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:52-61