Impossibilities for strategy-proof committee selection mechanisms with vetoers

Martin Van der Linden

Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2017, vol. 73, issue C, 111-121

Abstract: When a group of voters selects a committee out of a set of candidates, it is common and often desirable to endow these voters with some veto power. I present impossibility results showing that even limited veto power makes many mechanisms of interest manipulable. This applies in particular (i) to mechanisms the range of which contains a degenerate lottery in which a committee is chosen for sure and (ii) to mechanisms that are constructed from extensive game forms with a finite number of strategies. These impossibilities hold on a large set of domains including the domain of additive preferences, and even when probabilistic mechanisms are allowed and voters can report cardinal preferences.

Keywords: Mechanism design; Strategy-proofness; Veto; Probabilistic mechanism; Committee selection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406817301143
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Impossibilities for strategy-proof committee selection mechanisms with vetoes (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:mateco:v:73:y:2017:i:c:p:111-121

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.09.003

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Mathematical Economics is currently edited by Atsushi (A.) Kajii

More articles in Journal of Mathematical Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().