Confirmation bias in social networks

Marcos Fernandes

Mathematical Social Sciences, 2023, vol. 123, issue C, 59-76

Abstract: In this study, I present a theoretical social learning model to investigate how confirmation bias affects opinions when agents exchange information over a social network. Hence, besides exchanging opinions with friends, agents observe a public sequence of potentially ambiguous signals and interpret it according to a rule that includes confirmation bias. First, this study shows that regardless of level of ambiguity both for people or networked society, only two types of opinions can be formed, and both are biased. However, one opinion type is less biased than the other depending on the state of the world. The size of both biases depends on the ambiguity level and relative magnitude of the state and confirmation biases. Hence, long-run learning is not attained even when people impartially interpret ambiguity. Finally, analytically confirming the probability of emergence of the less-biased consensus when people are connected and have different priors is difficult. Hence, I used simulations to analyze its determinants and found three main results: (i) some network topologies are more conducive to consensus efficiency, (ii) some degree of partisanship enhances consensus efficiency even under confirmation bias and (iii) open-mindedness (i.e. when partisans agree to exchange opinions with opposing partisans) might inhibit efficiency in some cases.

Keywords: Social networks; Social learning; Misinformation; Confirmation bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165489623000203
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Confirmation Bias in Social Networks (2023)
Working Paper: Confirmation Bias in Social Networks (2023)
Working Paper: Confirmation Bias in Social Networks (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:123:y:2023:i:c:p:59-76

DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.02.007

Access Statistics for this article

Mathematical Social Sciences is currently edited by J.-F. Laslier

More articles in Mathematical Social Sciences from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().