Blindfolded monkeys or financial analysts: Who is worth your money? New evidence on informational inefficiencies in the U.S. stock market

Giuseppe Pernagallo and Benedetto Torrisi

Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2020, vol. 539, issue C

Abstract: The efficient market hypothesis has been considered one of the most controversial arguments in finance, with the academia divided between who claims the impossibility of beating the market and who believes that it is possible to gain over the average profits. If the hypothesis holds, it means, as suggested by Burton Malkiel, that a blindfolded monkey selecting stocks by throwing darts at a newspaper’s financial pages could perform as well as a financial analyst, or even better. In this paper we used a novel approach, based on confidence intervals for proportions, to assess the degree of inefficiency in the S&P 500 Index concluding that for several stocks the weak form of efficiency should be ruled out: we estimated the proportion of inefficient stocks in the index to be between 12.13% and 27.87%. This supports other studies proving that the efficiency hypothesis could not be considered the norm and, consequently, a financial analyst could be a better investor than a blindfolded monkey.

Keywords: Efficient market hypothesis; Informational efficiency; Memory; Random walk; Runs test; Variance ratio (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437119316462
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

Related works:
Working Paper: Blindfolded monkeys or financial analysts: who is worth your money? New evidence on informational inefficiencies in the U.S. stock market (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:539:y:2020:i:c:s0378437119316462

DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122900

Access Statistics for this article

Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications is currently edited by K. A. Dawson, J. O. Indekeu, H.E. Stanley and C. Tsallis

More articles in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().