Impact on pre-and post-sarbanes oxley users’ perceptions by incorporating the auditor’s fraud detection responsibility into the auditor’s internal control report

Benjamin P. Foster, Guy McClain and Trimbak Shastri

Research in Accounting Regulation, 2010, vol. 22, issue 2, 107-113

Abstract: The Department of the Treasury’s Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession (Advisory Committee, 2008) has recommended that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) clarify the auditor’s role in detecting fraud in the auditor’s report. The PCAOB replaced Auditing Standard No. 2 (AS2) with Auditing Standard No. 5 (AS5) but did not clarify the auditor’s fraud detection responsibility in the auditor’s report covering internal control and/or the financial statements. The focus of this study is to evaluate (i) whether the PCAOB mandated auditor’s internal control report (ICR) format with a ‘limitations’ paragraph meets users’ expectations, (ii) whether users’ prefer an ICR incorporating auditor’s fraud detection responsibility, and (iii) whether users’ expectations have changed over time. Results based on analyses of data from prior studies indicate that in pre-and post-SOX time frames, an ICR format without a limitations paragraph and clarifying the auditor’s role for fraud detection best met users’ expectations from an audit, consistent with the Advisory Committee’s recommendation. Users’ perceptions of potential auditor liability associated with ICR formats have changed significantly over time. Pre-SOX users perceived reduced auditor liability associated with an ICR that contained a limitations paragraph, but post-SOX users perceive similar potential auditor liability with all ICR formats.

Keywords: Sarbanes-Oxley Act; Public company accounting oversight board; Internal control report format; Users’ expectations from an audit report (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045710000238
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reacre:v:22:y:2010:i:2:p:107-113

DOI: 10.1016/j.racreg.2010.07.005

Access Statistics for this article

Research in Accounting Regulation is currently edited by G. Previts

More articles in Research in Accounting Regulation from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().