EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A review of definitions and measures of system resilience

Seyedmohsen Hosseini, Kash Barker and Jose E. Ramirez-Marquez

Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, vol. 145, issue C, 47-61

Abstract: Modeling and evaluating the resilience of systems, potentially complex and large-scale in nature, has recently raised significant interest among both practitioners and researchers. This recent interest has resulted in several definitions of the concept of resilience and several approaches to measuring this concept, across several application domains. As such, this paper presents a review of recent research articles related to defining and quantifying resilience in various disciplines, with a focus on engineering systems. We provide a classification scheme to the approaches in the literature, focusing on qualitative and quantitative approaches and their subcategories. Addressed in this review are: an extensive coverage of the literature, an exploration of current gaps and challenges, and several directions for future research.

Keywords: Resilience; Engineering systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (280)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015002483
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reensy:v:145:y:2016:i:c:p:47-61

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006

Access Statistics for this article

Reliability Engineering and System Safety is currently edited by Carlos Guedes Soares

More articles in Reliability Engineering and System Safety from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:145:y:2016:i:c:p:47-61