EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Joint routing and aborting optimization of cooperative unmanned aerial vehicles

Rui Peng

Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2018, vol. 177, issue C, 131-137

Abstract: This paper incorporates the abort policy into the routing problem of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). In order to serve a number of targets, some UAVs can be deployed each visiting part of the targets. Different from other works on routing of UAVs, it is assumed that each UAV may experience shocks during the travel. In order to reduce the expected cost of UAV destruction, it is allowed that a UAV aborts the mission if it is found to have undergone too many shocks after it finishes serving a certain number of targets. The optimal routing plan together with the abort policy for each UAV are studied, with the objective to minimize the total cost consisting of the expected cost of UAV destruction and the expected cost for unvisited targets. Test case is used to illustrate the application of the framework.

Keywords: Unmanned aerial vehicle; Optimization; Tabu search; Routing; Mission abort policy; Shocks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (45)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832017314576
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reensy:v:177:y:2018:i:c:p:131-137

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.05.004

Access Statistics for this article

Reliability Engineering and System Safety is currently edited by Carlos Guedes Soares

More articles in Reliability Engineering and System Safety from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:177:y:2018:i:c:p:131-137