EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Proposal and assessment of a new geothermal-based multigeneration system for cooling, heating, power, and hydrogen production, using LNG cold energy recovery

Mohammad Ebadollahi, Hadi Rostamzadeh, Mona Zamani Pedram, Hadi Ghaebi and Majid Amidpour

Renewable Energy, 2019, vol. 135, issue C, 66-87

Abstract: Multigeneration systems (MGSs) driven by renewable sources are proved as cutting-edge technologies for multiple productions purposes to curb greenhouse gas emissions. With this regard, a novel geothermal-based MGS is proposed to produce multiple commodities of cooling, heating, power, and hydrogen, simultaneously, using liquefied natural gas (LNG) as cold energy recovery. The system is composed of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC), an ejector refrigeration cycle (ERC), an LNG power generation system, and a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer system. To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed MGS, energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analysis are employed as the most effective tools for the performance assessment of the system. It is found that the proposed MGS can produce cooling capacity, heating capacity, net output power, and hydrogen of 1020 kW, 334.8 kW, 1060 kW, and 5.43 kg/h, respectively. In this case, the thermal efficiency, exergy efficiency and total SUCP (sum unit cost of the product) of the MGS are calculated 38.33%, 28.91%, and 347.9 $/GJ, respectively. Furthermore, condenser 2 is introduced as the main source of irreversibility of the proposed MGS by exergy destruction ratio of 58.98%. Moreover, a comprehensive parametric study is carried out and it is concluded that the SUCP of the system can be optimized based on the geothermal inlet temperature. In addition, it is demonstrated that a higher thermal efficiency can be obtained by increasing the turbine 2 expansion ratio, evaporator temperature, and geothermal temperature or decreasing of the generator terminal temperature difference, turbine 1 expansion ratio, pump 3 pressure ratio, and condenser temperature. In the same vein, a higher exergy efficiency can be attained at high turbine 1 expansion ratio, turbine 2 expansion ratio, evaporator temperature, and pump 3 pressure ratio or low generator terminal temperature difference, geothermal inlet temperature, and condenser temperature.

Keywords: Multigeneration system (MGS); Thermodynamic analysis; Thermoeconomic analysis; Parametric study; Isobutane (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148118314277
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:renene:v:135:y:2019:i:c:p:66-87

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.108

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable Energy is currently edited by Soteris A. Kalogirou and Paul Christodoulides

More articles in Renewable Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:135:y:2019:i:c:p:66-87