Water use of a biomass direct-combustion power generation system in China: A combination of life cycle assessment and water footprint analysis

Yuli Zhu, Ji Liang, Qing Yang, Hewen Zhou and Kun Peng

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, vol. 115, issue C

Abstract: Biomass combustion for power generation plays an important role in achieving 1.5 °C climate target and fulfilling global energy demand, while putting pressure on global water resources. Confronted with severe water shortage, it is imperative to understand its comprehensive impact on water resource. Recently remarkable advances of life cycle assessment and water footprint analysis have been witnessed in this field. Based on a review of the two methods' history, we propose a combination evaluation framework and define an associated indicators set to integrate both methods' advantages. By methods integration, direct and indirect water use are combined with the green, blue, and gray water footprint to describe the water use in detail. Furthermore, the life cycle water footprint of a typical biomass direct-combustion power generation system in China is evaluated based on the combined method. Results show the system life cycle water use is 11.71 L/MJ, while agricultural plantation accounts for the major part (84.61%). In addition, direct green water footprint is the largest component (46.54%), while direct and indirect blue water footprints account for 36.59% and 1.74%, respectively; indirect gray water footprint is 1.771 L/MJ. In terms of water use intensity, the direct-combustion power generation is lower than bio-oil power generation, but far more than solar photovoltaic and wind power. Sensitivity analysis suggests that improving power generation efficiency, straw collection coefficient and cultivating high water-efficient crops can evidently contribute to alleviating water stress conditions for bioenergy production.

Keywords: Water footprint analysis; Life cycle assessment; Second generation biomass; Biomass direct-combustion power generation; Water footprint intensity; Water management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119306045
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:115:y:2019:i:c:s1364032119306045

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109396

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().