EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

On-design pre-optimization and off-design analysis of hybrid Brayton thermosolar tower power plants for different fluids and plant configurations

R.P. Merchán, M.J. Santos, I. Heras, J. Gonzalez-Ayala, A. Medina and A. Calvo Hernández

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, vol. 119, issue C

Abstract: A working fluid performs a Brayton cycle that is fed by a heat input from a solar power tower and from a combustion chamber, which burns natural gas. This hybrid system is described by a complete model that includes all the main losses and irreversibility sources (optical and thermodynamic). Numerical implementation and validation is performed based on a Spanish commercial plant. On-design computations are carried out varying the pressure ratio for four working fluids (dry air, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and helium), for different number of stages and for recuperative and non-recuperative configurations. When adjusting the pressure ratio, an improvement of about 7% in overall thermal efficiency is predicted for a dry air single-stage recuperative configuration with respect to a standard commercial gas turbine. A study about the main energy losses in each plant subsystem for some particular plant layouts is accomplished. A two-compression and expansion stages recuperative Brayton cycle working with air is expected to give overall thermal efficiencies about 0.29 at design conditions, which is about a 47% increase with respect to the simplest single-stage configuration. It is stressing that fuel consumption from the reheaters maybe higher than that of the main combustion chamber for multi-stage layouts. Off-design hourly curves of output records for the four seasons throughout a day are analyzed. Greenhouse emissions are also analyzed. Specific carbon dioxide emissions are smaller for helium than for dry air, when they both work in a single-stage non-recuperative configuration.

Keywords: Thermosolar hybrid plants; Multi-stage brayton; On-design pre-optimization; Off-design analysis; Greenhouse emissions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119307981
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:119:y:2020:i:c:s1364032119307981

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109590

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:119:y:2020:i:c:s1364032119307981