Dynamic analysis of sustainable biogas-combined-cycle plant: Time-varying demand and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
Israel Bernardo S. Poblete,
Ofélia de Queiroz F. Araujo and
José Luiz de Medeiros
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, vol. 131, issue C
Abstract:
Anaerobic-digestion degrades organic wastes, producing biogas to drive bioenergy turbines reducing fossil-fuel dependence. This work evaluates the biogas chain fromwaste-to-bioenergy, using models for dynamic simulation of biogas processing, bioenergy generation, and carbon capture. To do this, a dynamic anaerobic digestion model from the literature was expanded to implement dependence on time-varying external temperature and feedstock conditions and to introduce aspects of transient power plants with time-dependent electricity demand. Results demonstrate that external temperature and feedstock oscillations promote dynamic cycles in biogas production which have to be handled in a dynamic biogas-combined-cycle power plant with post-combustion carbon capture to match costs and transient electricity demand. Consequently, dynamic biogas-storage and bioenergy-storage were implemented to cope with demand/production fluctuations. Bioenergy-storage is accomplished via compressed-air-storage during electricity surplus periods to drive pre-heated turboexpanders during deficit periods. The biogas-combined-cycle, without carbon capture and bioenergy-storage, achieves 15 years of payback-time and 2.6 MMUSD net value. On the other hand, the sustainable configurations with/without bioenergy storage – both bioenergy with carbon-capture and storage systems achieving 1030 kg/h of negative emissions – reach feasibility for CO2 prices of 75 USD/tCO2 attaining net values of 2.02 and 0.18 MMUSD with 21 and 31 years of payback-time respectively.This implementation demonstrates that bioenergy storage with carbon negative emissions is feasible for small-scale biogas-fired combined-cycle plants.
Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Biogas combined-cycle; Dynamic analysis; Bioenergy; BECCS. Word count: 6825 words (excluding references; Captions; Title-page; Nomenclature; Abbreviations and acknowledgements) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120302884
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:131:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120302884
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109997
Access Statistics for this article
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski
More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().