Evaluation of the life cycle of hydrothermally carbonized biomass for energy and horticulture application
Poritosh Roy,
Animesh Dutta and
Jim Gallant
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, vol. 132, issue C
Abstract:
Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a promising method to process high moisture biomass into biofuel/biomaterial. The environmental benefits of biomass depend on the processing methods and its end-use. Although life cycle assessment (LCA) of HTC of wet biomass has been conducted, co-processing of peat moss with agricultural biomass (miscanthus) is yet to be reported. This study evaluates the environmental performance of hydrothermally carbonized biomass (peat moss, miscanthus, and a blend of the two) used for energy (S3, S5, S7) or soil amendment (S2, S4, S6, S8) and compared with untreated biomass (peat moss left on-site: S1; peat moss used for soil amendment: S2) to determine the most viable pathway of biomass. Hydrochar produced from miscanthus had a lower global warming potential (GWP) compared with the hydrochar from peat moss or their blend; however, other impact categories were observed to be greater. The environmental impacts from the life cycle of biomass depend on their life cycle pathways. The highest GWP was observed in the case of peat moss used for horticulture application (S2) followed by S3, S5, S4, S6, S7, S8 and S1. Hydrochar used in soil amendment was more environmentally benign than the energy application, but the benefits were dependent on the decomposition rate of biomass. Additionally, HTC process required a considerable amount of water even it can process high moisture biomass. Renewable energy and agricultural policy may be needed to encourage hydrochar use/production/integration into soil amendment and energy application in rural communities.
Keywords: Peat moss; Miscanthus; Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC); Soil amendment; Bioenergy; Environmental impacts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120303373
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:132:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120303373
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110046
Access Statistics for this article
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski
More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().