Analysis of direct and indirect quantification methods of CO2 fixation via microalgae cultivation in photobioreactors: A critical review

Yi An Lim, Meng Nan Chong, Su Chern Foo and I.M.S.K. Ilankoon

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, vol. 137, issue C

Abstract: Anthropogenic CO2 emissions are the main contributors to climate change. Among the various efforts to reduce atmospheric CO2 levels, cultivation of microalgae is the most promising approach owing to its high photosynthetic rates and CO2 fixation efficiencies than terrestrial counterparts. However, the accurate quantification method of CO2 fixation during the cultivation of microalgae in photobioreactors (PBRs) is lacking. Present methods for the determination of CO2 fixation during microalgae cultivation include direct and indirect methods, where 79% of direct method studies of the bibliometric analysis compared to 21% of indirect method studies. Direct methods evaluate the carbon content in microalgae biomass using assumptive values, though it results in significant errors as high as 50% in quantifying the CO2 fixation. This can be improved by measuring the carbon contents using elemental and total organic carbon analysis. On the other hand, indirect methods quantify CO2 concentration at inlet and outlet of PBRs by using gas chromatography or infrared sensors. It is rather difficult to validate the accuracy of direct and indirect methods due to the lack of comparative works and analysis among the methods. Additionally, there are no current studies that provide in-depth discussion and perspectives on the CO2 fixation methods. Therefore, the main aim of this critical review is to analyse, contrast and discuss the differences as well as inaccuracies of direct and indirect microalgae CO2 fixation quantifications in PBRs. This is followed by the recommendations for further improvements, and standard guidance for future studies in applying appropriate CO2 fixation quantification methods.

Keywords: Carbon fixation; Carbon quantification; CO2 sequestration; Microalgae; Photobioreactors; Sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120308637
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:137:y:2021:i:c:s1364032120308637

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110579

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().