Impact of the use of recycled materials on the energy conservation and energy transition of buildings using life cycle assessment: A case study in South Korea

Minjin Kong, Changyoon Ji, Taehoon Hong and Hyuna Kang

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, vol. 155, issue C

Abstract: This study was conducted to ascertain how the use of recycled materials instead of virgin materials affect the installation of renewable energy systems for the energy transition of buildings. LCA was used to estimate the life cycle energy use and GHG emissions of building and renewable energy systems with and without using recycled materials. For the case study, a public building and four representative photovoltaic (PV) systems were selected. National recycling standards and processes were considered for suggested recycled materials. In general, replacing virgin material with recycled counterpart reduced embodied GHG emissions more than embodied energy. However, due to high carbon intensity of operation energy and building materials without available counterparts, using recycled materials reduced the life cycle energy use and GHG emissions of the case building by 4.9% and 3.3%. Among four PV systems, using recycled materials was most significant in the single crystalline-silicon (sC-Si) PV system, 44.5% reduction of energy use and 41.3% reduction of GHG emissions. Therefore, when recycled materials are used for achieving the energy transition of the case building with the sC-Si PV system, the PV system requirements could be reduced by a maximum of 9.6% for energy payback and 4.9% for GHG payback. This study demonstrated that the use of recycled materials is effective at reducing the embodied energy and GHG emissions of PV systems as well as buildings. To achieve carbon-neutral buildings, particularly, the use of recycled materials based on a thorough LCA should be considered in addition to renewable energy system.

Keywords: Recycled material use; Energy transition; Life cycle assessment; Renewable energy system; Energy payback time; Greenhouse gas payback time (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121011588
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:155:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121011588

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111891

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().