Quality of gaseous biofuels: Statistical assessment and guidance on production technologies

Guohui Song, Jun Xiao, Chao Yan, Haiming Gu and Hao Zhao

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, vol. 169, issue C

Abstract: The wide variation in the properties of gaseous biofuels pose a major challenge to the practical application. This study focused on composition-related qualities of various purified gaseous biofuels excluding the effects of residual impurities. It built an informative compositional database of 20 types of existing and predicted gaseous biofuels. The ranges of the major constituent gases are as follows, CH4: 0.01–98.00 vol%, H2: 0.01–72.74 vol%, CO: 0–56.84 vol%, C2H4: 0–8.89 vol%, C2H6: 0–2.78 vol%, CO2: 0.01–87.40 vol%, N2: 0.01–94.98 vol%, O2: 0–6.53 vol%. The quality indicators, such as heating values, explosive limits, toxicity, and interchangeability, were statistically investigated. Subsequently, two methods for classifying gaseous biofuels regarding heating value and toxicity were proposed. The results show that synthetic natural gas, biogas, and methanation products of producer gases from gasification with steam, high-purity O2 (nearly 100%), and O2-enriched air (50–70% purity) are the preferred gaseous biofuels for different application scenarios. The CO and H2 contents are recommended to be limited to 2 vol% and 5 vol%, respectively. Then, suitable source and upgrading technologies are selected based on the quality results. Furthermore, the concept of electrification of biomass conversion including electricity-driven gasification and synthesis technologies was proposed. Diverse electricity-driven gasification technologies were analyzed with their applications and limitations. The results point out that the biomass and power-to-X pathway provides promising solutions for biomass and organic waste management, grid stability, sustainable fuel production, and decarbonization.

Keywords: Gaseous biofuels; Gas quality; Explosive limit; Toxicity; Interchangeability; Electricity-driven gasification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122008401
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:169:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122008401

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112959

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().