A synthesis of the ecosystem services impact of second generation bioenergy crop production

R.A. Holland, F. Eigenbrod, A. Muggeridge, G. Brown, D. Clarke and G. Taylor

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, vol. 46, issue C, 30-40

Abstract: The production of bioenergy from second generation (2G) feedstocks is being encouraged by legislation targeted at addressing a number of controversial issues including carbon emissions driven by land-use change and competition for crops used in food production. Here, we synthesise the implications of 2G feedstock production for a range of key ecosystem services beyond climate regulation. We consider feedstocks typical of temperate systems (Miscanthus; short-rotation coppice, short rotation forestry) and transitions from areas of forest, marginal land and first generation (1G) feedstock production. For transitions from 1G feedstocks, studies suggest significant benefits may arise for a number of ecosystem services, including hazard regulation, disease and pest control, water and soil quality. Although less evidence is available, the conversion of marginal land to 2G production will likely deliver benefits for some services while remaining broadly neutral for others. Conversion of forest to 2G production will likely reduce the provision of a range of services due to increased disturbance associated with shortening of the management cycle. Most importantly, further research is needed to broaden, and deepen, our understanding of the implications of transitions to 2G feedstocks on ecosystem services, providing empirical evidence for policy development, particularly for commercial deployment where landscape scale effects may emerge. A programme of research that mixes both the natural and social sciences based on an ecosystem service framework, and occurs concurrently with large scale commercial deployment of 2G feedstocks, would address this gap, providing evidence on the effectiveness of policies to promote production of 2G feedstocks on a wide range of ecosystem services.

Keywords: Biofuel; Ecosystem services; Miscanthus; Short rotation coppice; Short rotation forestry; Land use (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211500091X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:46:y:2015:i:c:p:30-40

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.003

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().