 Cut your grass and eat it too– Is aviation biofuel production and grazing in the Australian tropics possible?Alexander Herr, Andrew Braid, John Carter, John McIvor, Helen T Murphy, O’Connell, Deborah, Nat Raisbeck-Brown and Michael Poole Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, vol. 53, issue C, 1377-1388 Abstract: The aviation industry is vulnerable to fuel price rises and carbon emission penalties. The use of bio-jet fuel will reduce emissions. However, there is only limited capacity for aviation fuel production in Australia. In a developing bio-jet fuel industry, it is not known whether there is sufficient biomass available at a reasonable price to support an industry. The literature identifies grasses as having good potential as a cost effective feedstock based on high productivity in tropical and subtropical cattle grazing areas, where there is limited competition with high value crops. Here we present an approach for assessing the biomass potential of grazing lands and apply it to a case study region in Australia. Biomass modelling showed grass biomass production in excess of grazing needs in favourable years of 1Mt within an area of 2500km2. This exceeds the demand of medium to large scale biofuel production facilities. The location of high production areas is variable over years but there are several consistent ‘hotspots’ of biomass production. However, in low rainfall years there is insufficient biomass produced to supply a bioenergy facility. The seasonal rainfall pattern in the area also requires storage of material for several months as harvesting in the wet season is undesirable. Cost for production of baled grass biomass (not including nutrient replacement and profits) to farm gate ranges from AU$50–$110/t. The opportunity cost for diverting grass from beef production to biomass for bioenergy is around AU$50/t. However, grass production for bioenergy would provide enterprise diversification options and environmental management benefits through reducing grazing impacts during the wet season in favour of dry season biomass harvest. The work highlights a potential for co-existence between biomass harvested for bioenergy and grazing systems, but more detailed research is required on environmental impacts and socio-economic considerations before considering implementation. Keywords: Bioenergy; Hay; Biomass; Lignocelluloses; Supply cost; Beef (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:53:y:2016:i:c:p:1377-1388 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.052 Access Statistics for this article Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.