 Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative water heater systems operating with unreliable water suppliesArif Yurtsev and Glenn Jenkins () Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, vol. 54, issue C, 174-183 Abstract: This paper reports on a cost-effectiveness analysis of four types of water heating systems operating in a situation where there is an unreliable water supply. These systems are electric water heating, a solar water heating system (SWHS) with electricity back-up, the SWHS with an LPG water heater, and an LPG water heater alone. It is found that in the conditions of North Cyprus, an SWHS with an LPG heater back-up is the most cost-effective, most convenient and most environmentally friendly system. The last two systems all have a cost per m3 of hot water that is approximately 50% of the cost of heating water by electricity. This study finds that in situations where there is a winter or cloudy season, the choice of the source of energy for SWHS׳s back-up during this period is critical for its overall cost-effectiveness. When a pressurized supply of water is available, the cost of heating water is reduced by 20% for the SWHS with LPG back-up and for the heating of water by the LPG heater alone. Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis; Water heater systems; Households; North Cyprus (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:54:y:2016:i:c:p:174-183 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.001 Access Statistics for this article Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.