Modeling and comparison of hourly photosynthetically active radiation in different ecosystems

Lunche Wang, Ozgur Kisi, Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani, Bo Hu and Wei Gong

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, vol. 56, issue C, 436-453

Abstract: Long-term hourly observations of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), global solar radiation (Eg) and meteorological variables [air temperature (TA), relative humidity (RH), dew point (TD), water vapor pressure (VW), air pressure (PA)] observed at different types of ecosystems (agricultural farmland, wetland, forest, bay, grassland, desert and lake) in China are reported for developing and validating PAR estimating models. Three improved Artificial Neural Network (ANN) methods, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN), and Radial Basis Neural Network (RBNN) are proposed in this study for predicting the hourly PAR using the combinations of above meteorological variables as model inputs. The ANN models have been compared with an efficient all-sky PAR model (ALSKY) through statistical indicies root mean square errors (RMSE) and mean absolute errors (MAE) at each station. The effects of meteorological variables on the hourly PAR predictions are further analyzed for investigating the main influencing factors for each model. The results indicate that there are large differences in model accuracy for each model at each ecosystem, for example, the MLP and RBNN models whose inputs are the Eg and TA (RMSE, MAE and R2 are 7.12, 5.24 and 98.90, respectively) perform better than the GRNN and ALSYK models at the agricultural farmland AKA station, while the GRNN model (RMSE and MAE are 12.47 and 8.98, respectively) performs better than other methods at DHL station. The model inputs also play different roles in different ecosystems for each ANN model, for example, TA and PA generally have more effects than the RH, TD and VW variables in the farmland stations, while RH is more important for hourly PAR prediction than the other variables in the bay stations. Finally, the overall rank of the model accuracy is obtained, MLP and RBNN models are more accurate for estimating hourly PAR at various ecosystems in China.

Keywords: Photosynthetically active radiation; Ecosystems; Artificial Neural Networks; Model accuracy; Comparison; Meteorological variables; China (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115013350
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:436-453

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.068

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().