Evaluation of transposition models of solar irradiance over Egypt
Samy A. Khalil and
A.M. Shaffie
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, vol. 66, issue C, 105-119
Abstract:
The main objective in this paper is to carry out evaluation of statistical comparison of the monthly hourly and the daily data of global, beam and diffuse solar radiation incident on a horizontal and inclined surfaces for Cairo, Egypt during the period time from 1984 to 2014. The maximum and minimum values of correlation coefficient (R2) are 0.994 and 0.968 according to Eqs. (13) and (15) respectively. The comparison between the measured (Gd,m) and calculated (Gd,c) values of the diffuse solar radiation along with the values of mean base error (MBE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean percentage error (MPE), and t-Test statics are summarized. The values of MBE results show that the isotropic, Perez's, Hay's and Klucher's models are substantially under predicts the irradiance incident on an inclined surface, and the Tamps and Coulson model considerably over predicts irradiance incident on an inclined surface on an overall basis, and the RMSE results indicate that the anisotropic models (Hay, Klucher and Perez) show similar performance on an overall basis, but isotropic model and Tamps and Coulson exhibit much larger error. In general we confirm that, the observation of the Perez's and Klucher models describe the irradiance on inclined plane more accurately than anther models. These results in the present work are good agreement with other work in [9,12,129,130] (Khalil and Shaffie, 2013a; Khalil and Shaffie, 2013b; Khalil and Shaffie, 2014; Khalil and Shaffie, 2016). The statistical results of the models for south facing and west facing surface in the present study are analyzed.
Keywords: Solar radiation; Mean base error; Isotropic models; Anisotropic models; Inclined surface (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116302921
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:66:y:2016:i:c:p:105-119
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.066
Access Statistics for this article
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski
More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().