EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Final and B molasses for fuel ethanol production and some market implications

Juan Arturo Castañeda-Ayarza and Luis Augusto Barbosa Cortez

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, vol. 70, issue C, 1059-1065

Abstract: Some concern about biofuels has been expressed because the growing demand for biofuels could cause, among other potential impacts, farming lands to be used for producing biofuel instead of food, thus raising food prices. Such concern is also present when considering the relationship between sugar and fuel ethanol production. The sugar market is characterized by a low growth rate of demand, volatile prices, widespread interventions and, recently, an increasing surplus production. In parallel, an emerging world market for fuel ethanol has expanded by 12% annually due to policy support. Some countries have mandated ethanol/gasoline blends, while others are looking for ways to introduce them or expand the existing market. The aim of this work is to assess the potential, in the short term, for fuel ethanol production by using intermediate molasses in countries that industrialize sugarcane. The following main sugarcane producing countries were taken as example: Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico, Australia, India, and Thailand. The result of this research shows that those countries could together produce an amount equal to approximately 16.5% of the fuel ethanol produced worldwide in 2015. In addition, four countries could replace more than 10% of their national gasoline consumption with ethanol produced from A molasses. This work, however, suggest producing fuel ethanol by using final molasses and 20% of B molasses. That option would cause a 3% average reduction in sugar production; but, this decline is nonetheless equivalent to the average growth rate of the global sugar surplus in the last three years. Moreover, the suggested scheme showed a favorable opportunity cost in comparison with the exclusive production of sugar. The proposed type of ethanol production could support the development of national ethanol markets in the short term, while more sustainable options (e.g., ethanol from residual lignocellulosic materials) are not available.

Keywords: Bioethanol; Sugarcane; Sugarcane by-products; Ethanol market; Sugar market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116310577
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:70:y:2017:i:c:p:1059-1065

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600126/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.010

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski

More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu (repec@elsevier.com).

 
Page updated 2024-12-28
Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:70:y:2017:i:c:p:1059-1065