 Evaluating expected and comparing with observed risks on a large-scale solar photovoltaic construction project: A case for reducing the regulatory burdenTurlough F. Guerin Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, vol. 74, issue C, 333-348 Abstract: The overwhelming benefits of building solar power plants instead of fossil fuel powered sites for new generation capacity outweigh the less significant risks, some of which are identified in this study on the construction stage of a utility-scale solar energy (USSE) project. This project confirmed and clarified the nature of environmental and community risks to be expected on Australian construction sites. Expected risks from desk top studies and related planning requirements captured the majority of those risks actually experienced in the field during the construction phase. The large number of approval conditions (set by the relevant regulatory authorities; state and local) for the construction stage of the project, are arguably excessive compared with the risk profile of the project, and the overall positive benefits to the environment, economy and local community. The environmental and community risks of greatest concern (including dust control, optimising vegetation growth under the panels, waste management, a lack of common understanding of expectations for local job opportunities), while planned and eventually managed, could have been more efficiently addressed by further upfront investigations, and questioning and enhancing the governance processes by the engineering procurement construction (EPC) entity (or constructor). For example, managing the end-of-life packaging materials (EOLPMs) was a specific unexpected risk on the project during the construction stage, which can be overcome on future remote location projects by enhancing the design and execution of project-level contracts and securing partners such as resource recovery companies or other end users (of EOLPMs) at the earlier, planning stage. Recommendations for regulators include to reduce approval constraints on new low-emissions electricity developments, particularly at the state and local government level. These should be considerably less onerous than building new fossil fuel electricity generation infrastructure. A sharper focus on regulatory red tape reduction will enhance USSE project adoption. Keywords: Governance; Risk management; Renewable energy; Solar photovoltaic (SPV); Construction management; Planning approvals; Environmental management; Utility scale solar energy (USSE); Constraints; Regulatory burden (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:rensus:v:74:y:2017:i:c:p:333-348 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.040 Access Statistics for this article Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is currently edited by L. Kazmerski More articles in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.