Designing grant-review panels for better funding decisions: Lessons from an empirically calibrated simulation model

Thomas Feliciani, Michael Morreau, Junwen Luo, Pablo Lucas and Kalpana Shankar

Research Policy, 2022, vol. 51, issue 4

Abstract: To explore how factors relating to grades and grading affect the correctness of choices that grant-review panels make among submitted proposals. To identify interventions in panel design that may be expected to increase the correctness of choices.

Keywords: Research evaluation; Scoring; Inter-rater reliability; Social simulation; Peer review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733321002596
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:51:y:2022:i:4:s0048733321002596

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104467

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().