Diffusion to peers in firm-hosted user innovation communities: Contributions by professional versus amateur users

Max Mulhuijzen and Jeroen P.J. de Jong

Research Policy, 2024, vol. 53, issue 1

Abstract: Users can develop innovations that improve or complement a firm's product. To benefit from these, firms may host online user innovation communities (UICs) with two purposes: 1. Incorporate user innovations into the firm's products, and 2. Facilitate the direct diffusion of user innovations to peer users to increase the product's general value. The second of these objectives (antecedents of peer diffusion) is under-investigated. Peer diffusion comes with additional challenges: when the hosting firm's innovation experts (e.g., R&D workers) do not pick up the role of continued development, adoption by peers is frustrated—as many user innovators lack the expertise to improve their initial prototypes so that peers can easily adopt. We address this gap by exploring if contributions by professional external users of the hosting firm's product have better peer diffusion rates compared to those of amateur users. We argue that professionals' expertise in design and marketing enables them to improve their initial prototypes, which peers can adopt more easily. Next, taking an interactionist perspective, we hypothesize that the relationship between professional user status and peer diffusion is amplified by users' commercial motivation and their central position in the UIC's network. We analyze multiple-source data of 614 innovations contributed by 122 users of a firm-hosted UIC in 3D printing. We find that contributions by professionals indeed diffuse better, but only at high commercial motivation or favorable network positions (high closeness centrality). To firm-hosted UICs, professional users are an important asset advancing the free peer diffusion of user innovations without firm interventions and merit attention when designing UICs.

Keywords: User innovation; User communities; Diffusion; Professionalism; Social networks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D85 O30 O31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733323001816
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:53:y:2024:i:1:s0048733323001816

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104897

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().