Hedging effectiveness comparisons: A note

Donald Lien and Keshab Shrestha

International Review of Economics & Finance, 2008, vol. 17, issue 3, 391-396

Abstract: This note examines the hedging effectiveness of three hedge strategies on twenty-four commodity and financial markets. Lien (Lien, D., 2005a, The use and abuse of the hedging effectiveness measure, International Review of Financial Analysis 14, 277-282, Lien, D., 2005b, A note on the superiority of the OLS hedge ratio, Journal of Futures Markets 25, 1121-1126.) suggest that, absent from estimation errors, the minimum variance (MV) hedge ratio attains the maximum post-sample hedging effectiveness when there is no structural change across estimation and comparison samples. When comparing the MV strategy with the naïve hedge ratio, we find sufficiently strong support for the conclusion. On the other hand, driven by estimation errors, weaker support is produced when comparing MV and error correction (EC) hedge strategy.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059-0560(07)00002-0
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reveco:v:17:y:2008:i:3:p:391-396

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Economics & Finance is currently edited by H. Beladi and C. Chen

More articles in International Review of Economics & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().