Efficiency of funding to rural revitalization and regional heterogeneity of technologies in China: Dynamic network nonconvex metafrontiers
Tiantian Ren,
Na Wang,
Helu Xiao and
Zhongbao Zhou
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2024, vol. 92, issue C
Abstract:
How to assess the performance of funds to support the rural revitalization is closely concerned by both academics and industries. In this paper, taking agricultural loans and financial allocations as inputs, we open the dynamic internal structure of the funding to support the rural revitalization system (FSRRS), including the agricultural support funds system (ASFS) and the rural revitalization system (RRS). With the consideration of regional heterogeneity, we propose the dynamic network data envelopment analysis (DEA) models based on convex and nonconvex metafrontiers to measure the metatechnology-specific technical efficiency (MTE), group-specific technical efficiency (GTE) and technology gap ratio (TGR) of the overall system and subsystems. The proposed models are empirically applied to assess the efficiency of funding to support rural revitalization and regional heterogeneity of technologies for 31 provinces in China during 2017–2020. The results show that: (i) compared to the nonconvex metafrontier model, its convex counterpart underestimates the efficiency of each decision making unit (DMU), resulting in the unfairness of evaluation, in particular for the central and western regions; (ii) there is a difference in the efficiency of the overall system and the subsystems, where the RRS performance is superior to the ASFS performance, implying that the inefficiency of FSRRS is mainly attributed to the low utilization of agricultural support funds; (iii) the period efficiency of the overall system and subsystems show an increasing trend over time, and the magnitudes of increases are different across provinces (regions); (iv) the TGRs of various provinces (regions) exhibit a significant heterogeneity.
Keywords: Data envelopment analysis; Metafrontier; Dynamic network structure; Agricultural support fund; Rural revitalization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124000247
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:soceps:v:92:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124000247
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.101825
Access Statistics for this article
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences is currently edited by Barnett R. Parker
More articles in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().