Eliciting community preferences for complementary micro health insurance: A discrete choice experiment in rural Malawi

Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro, Aleksandra Torbica (), Kassim Kwalamasa and Manuela De Allegri

Social Science & Medicine, 2014, vol. 120, issue C, 160-168

Abstract: There is a limited understanding of preferences for micro health insurance (MHI) as a strategy for moving towards universal health coverage. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), we explored community preferences for the attributes and attribute-levels of a prospective MHI scheme, aimed at filling health coverage gaps in Malawi. Through a qualitative study informed by a literature review, we identified six MHI attributes (and attribute-levels): unit of enrollment, management structure, health service benefit package, copayment levels, transportation coverage, and monthly premium per person. Qualitative data was collected from 12 focus group discussions and 8 interviews in August–September, 2012. We constructed a D-efficient design of eighteen choice-sets, each comprising two MHI choice alternatives and an opt-out. Using pictorial images, trained interviewers administered the DCE in March–May, 2013, to 814 household heads and/or their spouse(s) in two rural districts. We estimated preferences for attribute-levels and relative importance of attributes using conditional and nested logit models. The results showed that all attribute-levels except management by external NGO significantly influenced respondents' choice behavior (P < 0.05). These included: enrollment as core nuclear family (odds ratio (OR) = 1.1574), extended family (OR = 1.1132), compared to individual; management by community committee (OR = 0.9494) compared to local micro finance institution; comprehensive health service package (OR = 1.4621), medium service package (OR = 1.2761), compared to basic service package; no copayment (OR = 1.1347), 25% copayment (OR = 1.1090), compared to 50% copayment; coverage of all transport (OR = 1.5841), referral and emergency transport (OR = 1.2610), compared to no transport; and premium (OR = 0.9994). The relative importance of attributes is ordered as: transport, health services benefits, enrollment unit, premium, copayment, and management. To maximize consumer utility and encourage community acceptance of MHI, potential MHI schemes should cover transport costs, offer a comprehensive benefit package, define the core family as the unit of enrollment, avoid high copayments, and be managed by a competent financial institution.

Keywords: Malawi; Rural communities; Discrete choice experiment; Preferences; Micro health insurance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953614005887
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:120:y:2014:i:c:p:160-168

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01

DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.021

Access Statistics for this article

Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian

More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().