Public views on principles for health care priority setting: Findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology
Job van Exel,
Rachel Baker,
Helen Mason,
Cam Donaldson and
Werner Brouwer
Social Science & Medicine, 2015, vol. 126, issue C, 128-137
Abstract:
Resources available to the health care sector are finite and typically insufficient to fulfil all the demands for health care in the population. Decisions must be made about which treatments to provide. Relatively little is known about the views of the general public regarding the principles that should guide such decisions.
Keywords: Europe; Resource allocation; Decision making; Health care; Social values; Q methodology; QALYs; Equity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953614008314
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Public views on principles for health care priority setting: Findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socmed:v:126:y:2015:i:c:p:128-137
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
http://www.elsevier. ... _01_ooc_1&version=01
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.023
Access Statistics for this article
Social Science & Medicine is currently edited by Ichiro (I.) Kawachi and S.V. (S.V.) Subramanian
More articles in Social Science & Medicine from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu (repec@elsevier.com).