EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Can we make use of perception of questions' easiness in Delphi-like studies? Some results from an experiment with an alternative feedback

Carlos Tadao Kawamoto, James Terence Coulter Wright, Renata Giovinazzo Spers and Daniel Estima de Carvalho

Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, vol. 140, issue C, 296-305

Abstract: The main goal of this study is to investigate an alternative feedback for Delphi-like applications, based on a subgroup of elite panellists selected from their perception of questions' easiness, in order to increase the results' accuracy. The use of declared easiness perception is an old idea appearing in the earliest studies by Rand Corporation members, but rarely explored in recent publications. We ran an experiment with 79 students and 43 questions in 2015 and 2016, where the treatment subgroup received the assembled elite feedback, and the control subgroup received statistics based on all panellists. The results did not show a statistically significant predominance of higher accuracy with feedback based on the elite subgroup, although correlation between accuracy and easiness perception was not negligible.

Keywords: Delphi technique; Expert judgement; Feedback; Technological foresight (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162518311405
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:140:y:2019:i:c:p:296-305

DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.020

Access Statistics for this article

Technological Forecasting and Social Change is currently edited by Fred Phillips

More articles in Technological Forecasting and Social Change from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:140:y:2019:i:c:p:296-305