Less information, more comparison, and better performance: evidence from a field experiment
Henry Eyring,
Patrick J. Ferguson and
Sebastian Koppers
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library
Abstract:
We use a field experiment in professional sports to compare effects of providing absolute, relative, or both absolute and relative measures in performance reports for employees. Although studies have documented that the provision of these types of measures can benefit performance, theory from economic and accounting literature suggests that it may be optimal for firms to direct employees’ attention to some types of measures by omitting others. In line with this theory, we find that relative performance information alone yields the best performance effects in our setting—that is, that a subset of information (relative performance information) dominates the full information set (absolute and relative performance information together) in boosting performance. In cross-sectional and survey-data analyses, we do not find that restricting the number of measures shown per se benefits performance. Rather, we find that restricting the type of measures shown to convey only relative information increases involvement in peer-performance comparison, benefitting performance. Our findings extend research on weighting of and responses to measures in performance reports.
JEL-codes: M40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 55 pages
Date: 2021-05-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc, nep-eff, nep-exp, nep-hrm, nep-isf and nep-spo
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Published in Journal of Accounting Research, 1, May, 2021, 59(2), pp. 657 - 711. ISSN: 0021-8456
Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/109789/ Open access version. (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:109789
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().