Do pre-analysis plans hamper publication?

George K. Ofosu and Daniel N. Posner

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: Scholars assert that pre-analysis plans (PAPs) generate boring, lab-report style papers and thus hamper publication. We test this claim by comparing the publication rates of experimental NBER working papers with and without PAPs. We find that articles with PAPs are slightly less likely to be published. However, conditional on being published, PAP-generated papers are significantly more likely to land in top-five journals. Also, PAP-based journal articles generate more citations. Our findings suggest that the alleged trade-off between career concerns and the scientific credibility that comes from registering and adhering to a PAP is less stark than is sometimes alleged.

JEL-codes: A14 I23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 5 pages
Date: 2020-05-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-sog
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Published in AEA Papers and Proceedings, 1, May, 2020, 110, pp. 70-74. ISSN: 2574-0768

Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/112748/ Open access version. (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:112748

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().