Do ESG funds make stakeholder-friendly investments?
Aneesh Raghunandan and
Shiva Rajgopal
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library
Abstract:
Investment funds that claim to focus on socially responsible stocks have proliferated in recent times. In this paper, we verify whether ESG mutual funds actually invest in firms that have stakeholder-friendly track records. Using a comprehensive sample of self-labelled ESG mutual funds (as identified by Morningstar) in the United States from 2010 to 2018, we find that these funds hold portfolio firms with worse track records for compliance with labor and environmental laws, relative to portfolio firms held by non-ESG funds managed by the same financial institutions in the same years. Relative to other funds offered by the same asset managers in the same years, ESG funds hold stocks that are more likely to voluntarily disclose carbon emissions performance but also stocks with higher carbon emissions per unit of revenue. Despite these findings, ESG funds hold portfolio firms with higher average ESG scores. We show that ESG scores are correlated with the quantity of voluntary ESG-related disclosures but not with firms’ compliance records or actual levels of carbon emissions. Finally, ESG funds appear to underperform financially relative to other funds within the same asset manager and year, and to charge higher fees. Our findings suggest that socially responsible funds do not appear to follow through on proclamations of concerns for stakeholders.
Keywords: social responsibility; ESG; SEC; environmental and labor laws; mutual fund; violation tracker (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G23 G34 M14 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 42 pages
Date: 2022-09-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env and nep-fmk
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Published in Review of Accounting Studies, 1, September, 2022, 27(3), pp. 822 - 863. ISSN: 1380-6653
Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/115234/ Open access version. (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:115234
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().