Does the geographical footprint of Ethiopia’s flagship social protection programme align with climatic and conflict risks?

Janna Tenzing and Declan Conway

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: Ethiopia’s flagship ‘Productive Safety Net Programme’ (PSNP) entered its fifth phase of implementation in 2021. After more than fifteen years, the Government reoriented the programme’s targeting of woredas (districts) with a history of food insecurity, to prioritising those experiencing ‘extreme poverty through shocks’ – particularly drought. In doing so, it has rebranded the PSNP as an ‘adaptive’ safety net. The focus of the ‘adaptive social protection’ policy agenda, however, extends beyond responding to biophysical risks associated with climate variability and change; it also seeks to address non-climatic, contextual factors underpinning relational vulnerability to climate change. This study asks whether the PSNP’s system of geographic targeting at the start of its fifth phase aligns with this more comprehensive framing of ‘adaptive social protection’. Using binary logit regression analysis, it assesses whether the PSNP-covered woredas are those most exposed to three major risks in the country: drought, flooding, and political conflict. We find that, controlling for poverty headcount rate and population density, PSNP coverage is positively associated with districts experiencing higher year-to-year drought conditions, yet woredas with higher multi-year drought variability are less likely to be covered. We find no relationship between PSNP coverage and exposure to flood risk, which is unevenly distributed across the country. Whilst the programme is currently well-targeted toward districts facing disproportionately high levels of political insecurity, this association disappears if the recent escalation of conflict beginning in 2020 is disregarded. As such, this study points to risks that PSNP administrators need to be more attentive to as they consider expanding the programme’s geographical footprint to become more ‘adaptive’. Doing so could better support the strengthening of PSNP participants’ long-term resilience to climate change.

JEL-codes: Q50 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 56 pages
Date: 2023-08-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/120563/ Open access version. (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:120563

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().