Systematic measurement error in election violence data: causes and consequences

Inken von Borzyskowski and Michael Wahman

LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library

Abstract: What are the causes and consequences of systematic measurement error in violence measures drawn from media-based conflict event data? More specifically, how valid are such event data for geo-coding and capturing election violence? We examine sub-national variation in election violence and use original data from domestic election monitor surveys as a comparison to widely used sources of event data. We show that conventional data under-report events throughout the election cycle, particularly in densely populated areas and in anticipated violence hotspots. Moreover, systematic measurement error of media-based event data for measuring election violence generates significant relationships where none exist, and different effect magnitudes. We offer ways forward for future research and indicate ways in which existing work on election violence may have been affected by systematic measurement error

JEL-codes: C1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-10-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in British Journal of Political Science, 1, October, 2018. ISSN: 0007-1234

Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/90450/ Open access version. (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:90450

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().