How to refine the contributions to the Single Resolution Fund? Proposal for an alternative methodology

Willem Pieter De Groen and Inna Oliinyk

CEPS Papers from Centre for European Policy Studies

Abstract: The Single Resolution Fund (SRF) needs to provide the necessary funding for resolutions, avoiding the need to bail out banks with taxpayers’ money. The SRF relies on the banks that are part of the Banking Union to collect the funds. However, the current methodology used to determine the SRF contributions is difficult to replicate, overly complex and not fully coherent with the remainder of the resolution framework and capital requirements. This study proposes an alternative methodology that could potentially address the challenges with the current SRF contribution methodology. The alternative methodology reduces and simplifies the number of indicators used, as well as the number of contributors. Additionally, the proposed alternative methodology significantly reduces the number of risk-adjusted contributors and is more aligned with other bank requirements.

Pages: 77 pages
Date: 2021-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Ref ... tions-to-the-SRF.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eps:cepswp:34788

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPS Papers from Centre for European Policy Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Margarita Minkova ().