Comparing and assessing recovery and resilience plans – Second edition

Francesco Corti, Jorge Núñez Ferrer, Tomás Ruiz de la Ossa and Alessandro Liscai

CEPS Papers from Centre for European Policy Studies

Abstract: One year has now passed since the adoption of the RRF Regulation and most of EU Member States have now started to implement their recovery plans. Yet, many questions remain unanswered about the plans’ actual capacity to deliver their stated objectives. The complexity and heterogeneity of the plans makes it not only difficult to compare and assess them, but also raises doubts on existing capacity to monitor their implementation. Building on the methodological approach and the experience gained from the previous study we presented in September 2021, this updated paper further expands our initial analysis, including two new countries (Austria and Belgium), and introduces new insights on how far the plans cover entirely new investments or are being simply earmarked for previously budgeted expenditure. This paper is part of the ongoing CEPS Recovery and Resilience Reflection Project.

Pages: 104 pages
Date: 2022-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ppm
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/RRR ... S-FR-PT-SK-AT-BE.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eps:cepswp:35879

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPS Papers from Centre for European Policy Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Margarita Minkova ().