State Weakness in Eastern Europe: concept and causes

Verena Fritz

No 35, EUI-RSCAS Working Papers from European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS)

Abstract: State weakness has come to be recognized as a key problem for the transformations in a number of Eastern European countries, particularly those East and South of enlargement. This paper addresses the issue firstly by asking how state capacity can be assessed and observed empirically, and secondly, by considering the variables which may explain why some countries have developed weaker states than others. The paper is divided into three broad sections. The first section discusses the issue of how to assess state capacity. As a starting point, I distinguish between the state as a provider of solutions and the state as a source of problems. Both aspects need to be addressed in any evaluation of a state's capacity. Subsequently, the section discusses a number of qualitative and quantitative indicators which can yield useful information on the 'state of the state'. The second section turns to possible explanatory approaches. It considers the potential importance of legacies, of international integration, of the level of development, and of political consolidation. I conclude that the latter appears most directly relevant to the relative level of state capacity, while legacies and the level of development are important background conditions. International integration appears to be driven by higher capability rather than being a factor for stifling state capacity. The third and final section suggests some ways forward from situations of low state capacity. A first path is to promote learning and incremental improvements within the state. A second option is to enhance the capacity of citizens and civil society to demand more and better solutions from the state and to be able to challenge the state when it becomes a source of problems. A third option is to redesign the political systems in such a way as to increase coherence and to clearly attribute responsibility.

Keywords: governance; transition processes; post-Communism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-12-15
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac, nep-soc and nep-tra
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eui.eu/ERPA/RSCAS/../../RSCAS/WP-Texts/04_35.pdf Full text (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.eui.eu/ERPA/RSCAS/../../RSCAS/WP-Texts/04_35.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eui.eu/ERPA/RSCAS/../../RSCAS/WP-Texts/04_35.pdf)
http://www.eui.eu/ERPA/RSCAS/../../RSCAS/WP-Texts/04_35.pdf Full text (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.eui.eu/ERPA/RSCAS/../../RSCAS/WP-Texts/04_35.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eui.eu/ERPA/RSCAS/../../RSCAS/WP-Texts/04_35.pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:erp:euirsc:p0148

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in EUI-RSCAS Working Papers from European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Valerio PAPPALARDO ().