Democracy models and parties at the EU level: Empirical evidence from the adoption of the 2009 European election manifestoes
Emmanuel Sigalas, Monika Mokre, Johannes Pollak, Peter Slominski and
Jozef Bátora
No 13, RECON Online Working Papers Series from RECON
Abstract:
This paper builds upon the theoretical premises developed by Erik O. Eriksen and John Erik Fossum and empirically examines if democracy at the EU level is closer to the ideal-type of delegated, federal or regional-cosmopolitan democracy. We focus on a particular dimension of parliamentary representation, namely, party politics at the European level, and we concentrate on the 2009 European election party manifestoes. We hypothesise that under the delegated democracy model there should hardly be any similarities between the Euro-party and their member party manifestoes. The opposite should hold for the federal model, whereas in the case of the regional-cosmopolitan model the manifestoes should have a post-national outlook. Even though most manifestoes have a discernible European outlook and the national and Euro-party manifestoes share a number of common features, the differences remain more than the similarities. Our empirical findings suggest that the PES, the EPP and the EGP cannot be placed under the same EU democracy model.
Keywords: democracy; political representation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-08-15
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-pol
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_1013.pdf?fileitem=5456408 Full text (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:erp:reconx:p0070
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in RECON Online Working Papers Series from RECON
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marit Eldholm ().